Contracts for consumer credit continue to raise questions under EU law, especially in regard to the mandatory disclosure duties that form the subject of the book that was mentioned in the previous post. On September 11th, Advocate General Wahl gave his
opinion in a French case that is currently pending at the CJEU,
CA Consumer Finance v Bakkaus and Bonato (opinion not yet available in English).
The case concerns the interpretation of the European
Directive 2008/48/EC on credit agreements for consumers, in particular as regards pre-contractual information duties of professional credit providers towards consumers. Both Ms Bakkaus and Mr and Mrs Bonato had concluded contracts for car loans with CA Consumer Finance. In a dispute regarding the repayment of these loans, the
tribunal d'instance in Orléans of its own motion (the consumers had not appeared in court) raised several
preliminary questions concerning the rules of evidence applying under the European Directive. These questions concern the credit provider's duties under the Directive to (i) provide consumers with certain information and an explanation, in order for them to make a well-advised choice before entering into a credit agreement, and (ii) to assess the consumer's creditworthiness, with an eye on both parties' responsibilities when they decide to conclude the contract. According to French law, a credit provider faces severe consequences in case of non-compliance with these duties, including a loss of the possibility to recover interest on repayments of the loan.
The referring judge in Orléans wishes to obtain more clarity as to (a) who bears the burden of proof of (non-)fulfillment of the credit provider's information duties and (b) in which form evidence has to be produced. AG Wahl submits that the answer to the first question implicitly follows from the Directive, whereas the answer to the second question depends on national laws, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy of Member States.
According to AG Wahl, the effective exercise of the rights deriving from the Directive does not preclude a national provision, such as the French rule applicable in this case, that requires the credit provider to prove that he has correctly fulfilled his information duties. On the contrary, in line with the Directive's objectives of consumer protection, it may be assumed that the burden of proof rests on the professional credit provider. In case a national judge lacks sufficient information to assess whether the relevant information duties have been fulfilled, the judge should ask the credit company to provide additional data.
The AG is of the opinion that the credit provider may not shift the burden of proof to the consumer by simply including a standard term in the contract according to which the consumer declares to have received the relevant information. The Directive does not preclude credit providers from using such standard terms, as they may support the proof of fulfillment of information duties, but additional evidence may be required in the specific case.
As regards the consumer's creditworthiness, the AG considers that Article 8 of the Directive obliges the credit provider to assess this on the basis of sufficient information. In this context, the credit provider may not limit the assessment to simple declarations by the consumer that have not been checked. Article 8 does, however, in the AG's opinion not require the credit provider to systematically check information given by the consumer in order to establish its truthfulness.
Finally, AG Wahl submits that Article 5(6) of the Directive should be interpreted in the sense that, on the one hand, the credit provider should not assess the consumer's financial situation and needs before having given an explanation of the pre-contractual information, whereas, on the other hand, an appropriate explanation cannot be considered to follow from contractual information included in the credit agreement. The credit provider can, however, not be required to provide an explanation in a written document.
This post is just to remind our readers that there is only one month left to submit an abstract if you would like to present your work during our conference 29 June - 1 July 2015 in Amsterdam. We will make sure that the 15th International Association of Consumer Law conference will be informative and fun. While it's theme is "Virtues and Consumer Law" we understand it broadly and submissions in any areas related to consumer protection (e.g. consumer health, enforcement of consumer protection, consumer finances) are encouraged. We are planning three days packed with simultaneous sessions on various consumer protection issues so there will be a chance to discuss anything you may be interested in. The deadline for submissions is November 15th, 2014. 
Additionally, we will have a few scholarships available for participants from Asia, Africa and Latin America under the age of 35. We will award the scholarships at our discretion, based on the quality of the abstracts sent before the call for papers' deadline. Selected scholarship students will receive a fee waiver. Please add information that you are applying for this scholarship when you submit your abstract. 
